Scan Another

CVE Scan for kestra/kestra:latest-lts

Docker image vulnerability scanner

174 Known Vulnerabilities in this Docker Image

3
Critical
52
High
98
Medium
21
Low
0
Info/ Unspecified/ Unknown
CVE IDSeverityPackageAffected VersionFixed VersionCVSS Score
CVE-2026-107282criticalasync-http-client>=3.0.0,<=3.0.123.0.139.4

Impact

When a request is replayed onto a different host, the client updates only the current request and leaves the target request pointing at the original host. Four consumers read that stale value, and each one sends the first host's request, credentials, or both to the second host.

A replay happens through documented, ordinary features: a ResponseFilter that returns a different request, which is the supported failover pattern, and the IOException retry path. The attacker does not need to induce the replay; an application that uses failover produces it by design.

  • The socket to host B is filed in the connection pool under host A's key. A later request the application addresses to A is served over the connection to B, and A's Authorization header goes to B.
  • Over a CONNECT tunnel, the client tunnels to B and negotiates TLS with B correctly, then writes A's request into that tunnel. B receives A's path, A's Host, and A's Authorization. TLS does not protect against this, because the handshake really is with B, so no certificate mismatch occurs.
  • The replay reuses the original realm, so A's credentials are regenerated onto a replay request that carries no realm of its own. The cross-origin redirect path strips realms for exactly this reason; the replay path never did.
  • The stale value also decides whether TLS is used at all. When the original request was http:// and the replay is https://, no SSL handler is installed and the replayed request, credentials included, is written in cleartext.

Affected versions

  • 3.x: up to and including 3.0.12
  • 2.x: up to and including 2.16.0

Both lines are affected identically. This is long-standing behaviour, not a recent regression.

Patches

Fixed in 3.0.13 on the 3.x line and in 2.16.1 on the 2.x line. The target request now moves when a request is replayed, and the proxy moves with it: the proxy is part of the connection pool key, so correcting only the host would convert a harmless pool miss into a hit and route a proxied connection to a direct request.

Workarounds

Do not use a ResponseFilter that replays to a different host, and disable request retries, if the client is configured with credentials or used through a proxy. Replaying to the same host is not affected.

Details

NettyRequestSender.newNettyRequestAndResponseFuture calls setCurrentRequest without setTargetRequest, and replayRequest does not move the target either. The stale target is then read by the pool key derivation in NettyResponseFuture, by ConnectSuccessInterceptor when it writes the tunnelled request, by the realm selection in NettyRequestSender, and by NettyConnectListener when it decides whether to install an SSL handler.

Existing replay tests do not cover this, because all of them replay to the same host.

Package URL(s):
  • pkg:maven/org.asynchttpclient/async-http-client@3.0.10
CVE-2026-8763criticalbcprov-jdk18on<1.851.859.3
CVE-2026-75595criticalnetty-handler>=4.2.0.Final,<=4.2.16.Final4.2.17.Final9.1
CVE-2026-97689highpkg:pypi/urllib3@2.7.0>=1.10.3,<2.8.02.8.08.9
CVE-2025-52999highjackson-core<2.15.02.15.08.7
CVE-2026-10050highjetty-security>=12.0.0,<=12.0.3512.0.368.7
CVE-2026-107231highasync-http-client>=3.0.0.Beta1,<=3.0.123.0.138.7
CVE-2026-13506highbcprov-jdk18on<1.851.858.7
CVE-2026-29062highjackson-core>=3.0.0,<3.1.03.1.08.7
CVE-2026-33871highnetty-codec-http2>=4.2.0.Alpha1,<4.2.10.Final4.2.11.Final8.7

Severity Levels

Exploitation could lead to severe consequences, such as system compromise or data loss. Requires immediate attention.

Vulnerability could be exploited relatively easily and lead to significant impact. Requires prompt attention.

Exploitation is possible but might require specific conditions. Impact is moderate. Should be addressed in a timely manner.

Exploitation is difficult or impact is minimal. Address when convenient or as part of regular maintenance.

Severity is not determined, informational, or negligible. Review based on context.

Sliplane Icon
About Sliplane

Sliplane is a cloud platform that makes deploying and scaling your apps simple. Launch in minutes and grow as you go, containers included.

Try Sliplane for free

About the CVE Scanner

What is a CVE?

CVE stands for Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures. It is a standardized identifier for known security vulnerabilities, allowing developers and organizations to track and address potential risks effectively. For more information, visit cve.mitre.org.

About the CVE Scanner

The CVE Scanner is a powerful tool that helps you identify known vulnerabilities in your Docker images. By scanning your images against a comprehensive database of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), you can ensure that your applications are secure and up-to-date. For more details, checkout the NIST CVE Database.

How the CVE Scanner Works

The CVE Scanner analyzes your Docker images against a comprehensive database of known vulnerabilities. It uses Docker Scout under the hood to provide detailed insights into affected packages, severity levels, and available fixes, empowering you to take immediate action.

Why CVE Scanning is Essential for Your Docker Images

With the rise of supply chain attacks, ensuring the security of your applications has become more critical than ever. CVE scanning plays a vital role in identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers, especially those introduced through dependencies and third-party components. Regularly scanning and securing your Docker images is essential to protect your applications from these evolving threats.

Benefits of CVE Scanning

  • Enhanced Security: Detect and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited.
  • Compliance: Meet industry standards and regulatory requirements for secure software.
  • Proactive Maintenance: Stay ahead of potential threats by addressing vulnerabilities early.

The Importance of Patching Docker Images

Patching your Docker images is a critical step in maintaining the security and stability of your applications. By regularly updating your images to include the latest security patches, you can address known vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of exploitation. This proactive approach ensures that your applications remain resilient against emerging threats and helps maintain compliance with security best practices.

Want to deploy this image?

Try out Sliplane - a simple Docker hosting solution. It provides you with the tools to deploy, manage and scale your containerized applications.